Your Resume Is
Probably Bad.
Let's Find Out.

This resume reads like it was written at 2am the night before a deadline — which, based on the formatting inconsistencies, it probably was. You've listed 'Microsoft Office' as a skill in 2024. Bold choice. The summary section is essentially a horoscope: vague enough to apply to anyone, specific enough to mean absolutely nothing. Your bullet points are a masterclass in saying a lot without saying anything at all — "responsible for managing tasks" is the professional equivalent of describing yourself as "a person who does things." And listing 'team player' as an achievement? That's the career equivalent of listing 'breathing' as a hobby.

• Your professional summary is 4 lines of filler that could describe literally any human with a pulse — 'detail-oriented professional seeking to leverage my skills' tells a recruiter absolutely nothing except that you Googled 'resume summary examples'.
• You used 3 different bullet point styles across 2 pages. Pick one. This isn't a typography sampler, it's supposed to get you a job.
• Every single bullet starts with 'Responsible for...' — congratulations, you've described a job description, not an achievement. Recruiters already know what the role does; they want to know what YOU did.
• Your skills section lists 'Communication' and 'Problem Solving' next to 'Python' and 'SQL,' as if soft skills and hard skills are the same thing. They're not. Separate them or remove the fluff entirely.

Quick win: Replace every 'Responsible for...' bullet with a quantified achievement. Instead of 'Responsible for managing social media accounts,' write 'Grew Instagram engagement by 47% in 6 months through a data-driven content calendar, resulting in 12K new followers and a 23% increase in website referral traffic.' Numbers are the difference between a resume that gets interviews and one that gets deleted.